Review




Structured Review

Philips Healthcare epi fmri scans
Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the <t>fMRI</t> time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found
Epi Fmri Scans, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/epi+fmri+scans/epi+fmri+scans/pmc08249900-92-6-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epi fmri scans - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease"

Article Title: Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

doi: 10.1002/hbm.25448

Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the fMRI time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found
Figure Legend Snippet: Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the fMRI time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found

Techniques Used: Functional Assay

Related Articles

Functional Assay:

Article Title: Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease
Article Snippet: We used T1‐weighted MPRAGE scans and EPI fMRI scans from the initial visit in ADNI2/GO (Philips Platforms, TR/TE = 3000/30 ms, 140 volumes, 3.3 mm thickness, see www.adni-info.org for detailed protocols) for estimation of whole‐brain FCs. fMRI scans were processed with an in‐house MATLAB and FSL based pipeline (Amico et al., ).



Similar Products

86
Cytiva Europe ge epi fmri scans
Ge Epi Fmri Scans, supplied by Cytiva Europe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/epi+fmri+scans/bio_rxiv__2024__07__25__605068-220-66-66
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ge epi fmri scans - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Philips Healthcare epi fmri scans
Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the <t>fMRI</t> time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found
Epi Fmri Scans, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/epi+fmri+scans/epi+fmri+scans/pmc08249900-92-6-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
epi fmri scans - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Philips Healthcare fmri epi scans
Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the <t>fMRI</t> time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found
Fmri Epi Scans, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/epi+fmri+scans/epi+fmri+scans/10__1016_slash_j__jalz__2018__06__2183-30-1-5
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri epi scans - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG bold-fmri epi scan
Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the <t>fMRI</t> time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found
Bold Fmri Epi Scan, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/epi+fmri+scans/bold+fmri+system/pm21157844-10850-9-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bold-fmri epi scan - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the fMRI time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: Optimizing differential identifiability improves connectome predictive modeling of cognitive deficits from functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease

doi: 10.1002/hbm.25448

Figure Lengend Snippet: Differential identifiability framework ( I f ). (a) For each subject, two functional connectomes (FC) matrices (restA and restB) were estimated for each half of the fMRI time‐series. (b) FC matrices were vectorized (upper triangular) and placed into a group FC matrix. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition was performed on the group FC matrix. Each PC can be arranged as a matrix in the FC domain. (d) Individual FCs were reconstructed using different number of PCs. (e) I diff was estimated for different number of PCs (in order of explained variance) and the number of PCs maximizing I diff found

Article Snippet: We used T1‐weighted MPRAGE scans and EPI fMRI scans from the initial visit in ADNI2/GO (Philips Platforms, TR/TE = 3000/30 ms, 140 volumes, 3.3 mm thickness, see www.adni-info.org for detailed protocols) for estimation of whole‐brain FCs. fMRI scans were processed with an in‐house MATLAB and FSL based pipeline (Amico et al., ).

Techniques: Functional Assay